Extracts from:

The History of the Royal William ( Victualling ) Yard

and its association with Plymouth ,

LWM Stephens, circa 1961? Type written self published pamphlet.

Return to:

A Purveyor for the Armada

Pp 2 . The first evidence of a ( Navy ) Victualling Department appears in the reign of King Henry VI, when , in 1496, John Redynge, Clerk of the Spicery, was commissioned both the land and sea forces (Tellers roll No. 63). In July 1512 Sir Thomas Knyvet, Master of the Horse, was supplying the fleet. Bewteen 1544 and 1547, several agents were commissioned by the Royal Household to supply the fleet but they were subject to no central control, unless a reference to the Lord Chamberlain, Lord St John (Marquis of Winchester) as a “Chief Victualler” of the “Army at the Seas” may be held to apply his general superintendance of all Victualling arrangements. Victualling stores and requisites were obtained by purveyance and the victualling rate was 18d per man per week (in 1545). Ships were normally expected to carry two months provisions which were estimated to occupy 83 ton space in a 100 ton ship witj a compliment of 200 men. A pound of biscuit and a gallon of beer a day were allowed to each man and “200 pieces of flesh” (salt beef or stock fish) to every 100 men on four days of the week. The payment of provisions from 1542 to 1547 amounted to £65610 and records of the proceeding of various agents at Sandwich, Lowestoft, Portsmouth , Yarmouth , and Southampton are still traced to the record books.

 

Pp 4. There can be no doubt that Henry VIII had intended the formation of a victualling department to meet the needs of the growing Navy. The haphazard method of a dozen agents acting independently and uncontrolled by any central authority was distasteful to his ideas of systematic and responsible management. In 1547, Edward Baeshe, who previously had been one of many agents, was chosen with Richard Wattes to be “Surveyor of Victuals withing the City of London” but later, in 1550, he was appointed “General Surveyor of the victuals of the seas” by Letters Patent of 28 June 1550, with a fee of £50 per annum, ¾d per day travelling expenses and 2s per day for clerks. Provisions were obtained by exercising the Cron's prerogative of purveyance or forced purchase. The money was received from the Treasurer of the Navy and included in his estimates, although Baeshe also kept separate accounts.

 

By an agreement of 1565, purveyance at rates fixed by officers of the crown was abolished and Baeshe was to be paid 4½d a day for each man in harbour and 5d per day for each man at sea for providing provisions. He was not to use the right of purveyance unless ordered to victual more than 2000 men suddenly and was to keep in hand one month's provisions for 1000 men. Edward Baeshe was succeeded in 1587 by James Quarles who was in charge of the victualling at the time of the Spanish Armada of 1588 but his chief clerk Marmaduke Darrell was sent to Plymouth to supervise the victualling arrangements of the fleets of Lord Howard of Effingham and Sir Francis Drake.

 

Sir John Hawkins, as a merchant, believed in the contract system ( of victualling ) and his family business, under his brother William, was to control most oif the victualling arramgements in Plymouth . In 1568-69 Williams built the new conduit for improvement of the water supply for Plymouth and her ships. In 1573 they founded the town flour mills and in 1578-9 provided victuals for 5 ships and 250 men for a year. There was also a high standard of victualling on Hawkins' ships and food supplied included live sheep and pigs (to provide fresh meat) and apples and pears for the good heatlth of his crew. He also in 1595 took out clothes for his men and his policy led to the introduction of hammocks (then a store irem) in 1597 when a warrant authorising payment for 300 bolts of canvas “to makes hanging cabones or beddes….for the better preservation of their health”. The men of the Queens 's ships had to pay for their clothing, (canvass caps, breeches, shirt stocking and shoes); the supply was usually a private speculation on the part of the paymaster.

 

The victualling of the fleets in Plymouth prior to the encounter with the Spoanish Armada was to be the largest task yet encountered. Apart from the Queen's ships there was also a strong force of merchantmen. All English ports were required to supply some ships but to Plymouth fell the problem of feeding and watering this great fleet. Lord Howard's first letter to Lord Burghley, the Queen's chief minister declared, “It is a pity that they ( captains, soldiers and mariners ) should lack meat…”. In another letter he wrote, “I know not which way to deal with mariners to make the rest content with sour beer”. Victualling ships were constantly coming from other ports to supplement the local efforts. Drake's own fleet of 2900 men was reasonably well equipped with victuals compared to the squadron of 9500 seamen and 1000 soldiers sent to join him in May 1588. In July Lord Howard and Sir John Hawkins sent an estimate of victualling costs to Lord Burghley. Of £6000 provided, £5500 was spent and another £19570 was needed at Plymouth . In September the Surveyor General of Victuals, James Quarles, sent out his accounts for 300 days, 1 st December 1587 to 20 th September 1588 – victualling stores without pay came to £21155.

 

Lack of the Queen's money for paying for victualling stores mucy have been a headache for James Quarles's assistant surveyor of vixtuals, Marmaduke Darrell who was the victualling officer in Plymouth during 1588-9.

Return to:

A Purveyor for the Armada